ONLINE

Editorial Policy

Kyber Intel reports on privacy, surveillance, platform control, and digital sovereignty. Accuracy matters more than feeding the content machine.

Sourcing and evidence

Material factual claims should be tied to primary records whenever possible: laws, court filings, contracts, audits, technical documentation, reproducible tests, or direct statements. Secondary reporting can identify a lead, but it does not replace the underlying receipt.

We distinguish what a source proves from what it merely alleges. Company and government claims are attributed rather than repeated as established fact.

Testing and reviews

Hands-on testing is labeled as such only when the work can be supported by notes, outputs, dates, versions, and relevant limitations. News, first looks, and analysis are not presented as product tests.

Corrections and updates

Substantive errors are corrected promptly and transparently. Material updates should carry an updated date or an editor's note explaining what changed. Readers can report an error at kai@kyberintel.com.

Independence and conflicts

Paid access, review units, affiliate relationships, sponsorships, or other material conflicts must be disclosed where relevant. Sponsors do not control conclusions. Kyber Intel does not sell favorable coverage.

Privacy and lawful action

Kyber defends anonymous reading, speech, publishing, organizing, whistleblowing, and journalism. That position does not defend exploitation, threats, trafficking, or other serious crimes. Coverage of surveillance systems points readers toward lawful protections, oversight, public records, and practical alternatives—not sabotage or evasion of legitimate investigations.

Authorship and editorial labels

Reporting, analysis, opinion, field notes, and practical manuals should be labeled according to what they are. Kyber Intel is responsible for everything published under its name.